Portfolio and occupancy reporting
Occupancy, renewals, and income across the portfolio assembled from your property management system rather than rebuilt in a spreadsheet each month.
Reporting and workflow for property businesses: arrears found early, maintenance chased automatically, and a portfolio position that does not have to be assembled by hand for every meeting.
Occupancy sits in one system, arrears in another, maintenance in an inbox, and the owner report in a spreadsheet somebody rebuilds every month. Each part is current. The picture is only as current as the last time a person assembled it.
Occupancy, renewals, and income across the portfolio assembled from your property management system rather than rebuilt in a spreadsheet each month.
Overdue accounts surfaced while there is still time to act, with the exceptions escalated to the person who owns the relationship.
Requests logged, routed to a contractor, chased automatically, and closed with a record, instead of living in a mailbox nobody owns.
The same underlying numbers split by owner, so a managing agent is not rebuilding a separate pack for every mandate.
Leases, verification paperwork, and inspection records captured once and findable later, with renewals flagged before they lapse.
Enquiries, viewings, applications, and approvals tracked end to end, so nothing stalls silently between two people.
Property businesses tend to run a capable management system alongside an accounting package, a mailbox where maintenance arrives, and a set of spreadsheets that hold everything the other three do not. Each is correct about its own part.
The full position only exists when somebody assembles it, which happens on a schedule set by meetings rather than by events. Between assemblies, the business is working from a picture that is already out of date.
A maintenance request arrives as a message. It gets forwarded to a contractor, and from that moment its status lives in somebody's memory or in a thread. Nobody can say how many are open, how long the oldest has been waiting, or which ones a tenant has chased twice.
Given an owner at each stage, automatic follow-up, and a record at the end, the same process answers those questions without anyone being asked. It also gives you the history when a dispute arrives a year later.
Establish which decisions the portfolio reporting has to serve and where the numbers really live.
Build against your property management system and prove it against a month the team already signed off.
Move the people who read it weekly onto it and refine around how they actually use it.
“Arrears found at month end are a report. Arrears found in week one are a decision you can still act on.”
Yes. The reporting layer reads the system you already run, including on-premise ones, so the figures reconcile with your system of record rather than a spreadsheet kept alongside it.
The report assembles itself and leads with exceptions: what moved, what is overdue, and what needs a decision. Nobody compiles it, and it does not wait for a month-end cycle.
That is a standard workflow build. Each request gets a named owner at every stage, follow-up happens without anyone remembering, and there is a record of what was done and when.
Captured once, filed where it can be found, and flagged before renewals or verification lapse, rather than depending on someone noticing a date in a spreadsheet.
Yes. Definitions are agreed once and applied everywhere, then the same underlying numbers are presented per owner, so a separate pack is not rebuilt for every mandate.
A short discovery call, a working brief the same day, and a fixed price before anything starts. The first conversation is free.
Request a discovery call